Why is the reversioning so reviled?

Fire&Thunder · 12/08/14, 06:29 PM

So, they added cheesy and cheap comic book and animesque effects to a (charmingly in my opinion) cheesy and cheap show. Sometime it got excessive but other times it just seemed like whatever.

My only real issues with the reversioning was they edited out Squatt spiking the drinks in Foul Play in the Sky, which made no fucking sense.

Oh and I detested that Disney still did their stupid 32 episode rule (its not like it wasn't already a cheap project for them) when they should have had at least done 40 episodes, or if they only had time for 32 episodes, skip 8 of the boring episodes so you can end on Doomsday part 2.

Which reminds me imagine if the 32nd episode in production order was like Green Candle part 1. The reversioning would have ended on a cliffhanger

12/08/14, 06:29 PM	#1
Fire&Thunder Putty Patroller Join Date: 07/31/11 Posts: 1	Why is the reversioning so reviled? So, they added cheesy and cheap comic book and animesque effects to a (charmingly in my opinion) cheesy and cheap show. Sometime it got excessive but other times it just seemed like whatever. My only real issues with the reversioning was they edited out Squatt spiking the drinks in Foul Play in the Sky, which made no fucking sense. Oh and I detested that Disney still did their stupid 32 episode rule (its not like it wasn't already a cheap project for them) when they should have had at least done 40 episodes, or if they only had time for 32 episodes, skip 8 of the boring episodes so you can end on Doomsday part 2. Which reminds me imagine if the 32nd episode in production order was like Green Candle part 1. The reversioning would have ended on a cliffhanger